Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Timely Fall Risk Care Plan

Hanford, California Survey Completed on 04-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address the fall risk of a resident who had multiple medical conditions, including a history of skull fracture, muscle weakness, gait and mobility abnormalities, diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, and several neurological disorders. Upon admission, the resident was assessed as having moderately impaired cognition and was identified as a fall risk, with behaviors such as standing up without staff supervision. Despite these assessments, no fall risk care plan or effective interventions were put in place prior to the resident's first fall. The resident experienced eight falls over a period of less than a month, with incidents occurring in various locations such as the bed, wheelchair, dining room, and near the nurses' station. Staff interviews revealed that the resident was confused, impulsive, and unable to safely stand without assistance, yet continued to attempt to do so. Although the resident was placed on frequent checks, these interventions were not documented in the care plan, and more intensive supervision, such as 1:1 monitoring, was not implemented. Staff acknowledged that the resident's need for supervision and specific fall prevention strategies were not addressed in the care plan until after several falls had already occurred. Record reviews and staff interviews confirmed that the care plan lacked fall prevention interventions until well after the resident's risk had been established and multiple falls had taken place. The facility's own policies required the development of a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timely interventions based on resident assessments. However, the care plan for this resident was not initiated on admission, and the necessary interventions to address the resident's high fall risk and supervision needs were not included or implemented in a timely manner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙