Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Provide Timely Assessment and Adherence to Aspiration Precautions During Choking Incident

Tulare, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with severe cognitive impairment, aphasia, and Alzheimer's disease experienced a choking episode in the dining room while being fed by a family member. Nursing staff present in the dining room did not immediately identify or address the choking incident, despite being responsible for supervision during mealtimes. The resident continued to cough and vomit, and was only attended to after a family member flagged down a nurse. The staff present, including the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), did not provide prompt intervention as required by facility policy and their training. Following the choking episode, a comprehensive assessment was not completed for the resident. The DSD performed only a limited abdominal assessment and did not evaluate for respiratory distress, airway obstruction, or oral cavity issues, which are necessary after such an event. The DSD delegated monitoring of the resident to a Hospitality Aid (HA), a non-nursing staff member whose role does not include direct care or clinical assessment. The incident was not reported to the resident's primary nurse, and the HA was only instructed to watch the resident for safety, which was not appropriate given the seriousness of the choking event. Additionally, the family member who routinely fed the resident was not provided with education on safe feeding techniques or aspiration precautions, despite the resident being on a pureed diet with nectar-thickened liquids and specific swallow strategies outlined by the speech therapist. Observations showed the family member feeding the resident large bites and thin liquids, contrary to the care plan and physician orders. The facility also failed to ensure that the resident received the prescribed thickened liquids, as the resident was observed consuming thin liquids during meals. These failures resulted in the resident's needs being unidentified and improper assessment and care during a choking episode.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙