Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
E

Failure to Assess and Obtain Consent for Bed Rail Use Resulting in Physical Restraint

Van Nuys, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from the use of physical restraints by not performing required assessments and not obtaining proper physician orders prior to the use of bed rails. Specifically, two residents were found with both upper and lower side rails raised on their beds, despite only having consent and physician orders for the use of upper side rails. Facility policy requires a comprehensive assessment, informed consent, and physician order before implementing bed rails, as well as consideration of alternatives and evaluation of potential risks such as entrapment. For one resident, who had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and congestive heart failure, records showed dependency on staff for all activities of daily living and limited mobility. Although there was informed consent for upper side rails, observations revealed that both upper and one lower side rail were up. Facility leadership confirmed that the lower side rail should not have been raised without proper assessment and consent, as it could be considered a restraint and posed a risk of entrapment. A second resident, admitted with conditions such as adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, and major depressive disorder, also required substantial assistance with daily activities. This resident had a physician's order and informed consent for bilateral upper half side rails only. However, during observation, both upper and one lower side rail were found raised. Staff interviews confirmed that the lower side rail should not have been up and could be dangerous. Review of facility policies reiterated that bed rails are prohibited unless all criteria, including assessment and consent, are met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙