Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0699
E

Failure to Conduct Trauma Assessments for Residents

Tarzana, California Survey Completed on 05-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct trauma assessments for three sampled residents, each with significant medical and psychosocial histories. For one resident, the admission record showed diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, dementia, and chronic pain, with documentation of fluctuating decision-making capacity and moderate cognitive impairment. After an incident where the resident reported being struck, further review and family input revealed the report was likely a trauma response triggered by pain and past experiences. Despite these indicators, there was no documented trauma assessment in the resident's records. A second resident, with a history of diabetes with neuropathy and suicidal ideations, also exhibited fluctuating capacity for decision-making and moderate cognitive impairment. This resident required substantial assistance with daily activities. Review of clinical records confirmed that no trauma assessment was documented for this individual, despite their complex psychosocial and medical needs. A third resident, admitted with a recent fracture and cerebral infarction affecting the dominant side, also had moderate cognitive impairment and required significant assistance with personal care. Again, no trauma assessment was found in the records. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion regarding responsibility for trauma assessments, with the Social Services Director and Director of Nursing each indicating it was the other's responsibility. Facility policy required trauma-informed care and culturally competent services, but these were not implemented as trauma assessments were not completed for the residents involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙