Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Honor and Maintain Advance Healthcare Directives

Seal Beach, California Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor the advance healthcare directives for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to the residents' rights to have their healthcare decisions respected. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment, the advance healthcare directive designated a specific family member as the healthcare agent and indicated a preference not to prolong life. However, the resident's medical record contained a POLST form that authorized CPR and artificial nutrition, was signed by a different family member, and incorrectly stated that no advance directive was available. Both the registered nurse and the social services director confirmed that the POLST form did not match the resident's documented wishes or the designated healthcare agent. For another resident who was cognitively intact, the facility failed to maintain a copy of the advance healthcare directive in the medical record. Although the resident's family provided the directive and documentation indicated it was received by the medical records department, the document was not uploaded or made readily retrievable in the electronic health record. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the advance directive was not available in the resident's record, despite the POLST form indicating it had been reviewed. The facility's policy required that advance directives be obtained, maintained in a consistent and accessible section of the medical record, and that the resident's wishes be communicated to care staff and reflected in the plan of care. These requirements were not met for the two residents, resulting in the potential for their healthcare decisions and treatment preferences not being honored.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙