Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Update Diabetic Diet Terminology to Meet Professional Standards

Seal Beach, California Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality by not following the current diet manual recommendations for diabetic diets. Specifically, the facility continued to use the term "RCS" (Reduced Concentrated Sweets) for diabetic diets, despite guidance from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the American Diabetes Association indicating that such terminology is outdated and not reflective of current nutrition recommendations. The facility's diet manual, menus, tray cards, and dietary documentation all used the RCS nomenclature, and the Registered Dietitian (RD) confirmed that this terminology was used interchangeably with the Consistent Carbohydrate (CC) diet, even though RCS is not a recognized diet by professional organizations. Interviews with the RD revealed that she was aware of the discrepancy between the terminology used at the facility and current professional standards but had not communicated her concerns to the Corporate RD. The RD stated that the facility had always used the RCS terminology for diabetic diets and continued to do so after the implementation of their electronic health record system. The RD also confirmed that she was responsible for the nutrition care plans of all residents on these diets and that the care plans reflected the diet as ordered, using the RCS terminology. A review of facility records showed that 51 residents were receiving an RCS diet, with various modifications such as fortified, high protein, or renal adjustments. One resident with diabetes and a recent fracture was specifically noted to have an RCS NAS regular consistency diet ordered by the physician, and the RD confirmed that this was documented in the care plan and dietary records. The Director of Nursing (DON) also verified that the RCS nomenclature was used because it had been the facility's longstanding practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙