Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Involve Full IDT in Arbitration Agreement Process for Residents Lacking Capacity

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 04-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the arbitration agreement was properly explained and agreed upon with the appropriate Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) members for three residents who lacked decision-making capacity. According to the facility's policies, the Bioethics Committee, which includes the Administrator, DON, Medical Director, Primary Care Physician, Social Services, and Ombudsman, is responsible for making decisions on behalf of residents without capacity or a responsible party. However, in each case reviewed, the Administrator signed the arbitration agreement as the resident's legal representative without the involvement of the full Bioethics Committee, specifically excluding the Ombudsman. For one resident, medical records indicated the resident could make their needs known but was unable to make medical decisions. The arbitration agreement was signed by the Administrator on behalf of the IDT, but interviews confirmed that the Ombudsman was not present or involved in the decision-making process. The Ombudsman stated she had not participated in any Bioethics Committee meetings or meetings regarding arbitration agreements for over a year. Similar findings were noted for two other residents who also lacked decision-making capacity, with the Administrator signing the agreements without the required participation of the Ombudsman or the full Bioethics Committee. These actions were inconsistent with the facility's own policies, which require the arbitration agreement to be explained in a manner understandable to the resident or their representative, and for the Bioethics Committee to be involved in such decisions for residents lacking capacity. The failure to involve the appropriate IDT members, including the Ombudsman, in the arbitration agreement process was confirmed through interviews and record reviews for all three residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙