Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Obtain and Document Complete Informed Consents for Care and Treatment

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 04-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that accurate and complete informed consents were obtained for several residents, as required by its own policies and procedures. For multiple residents who lacked capacity to make their own medical decisions and had no legal surrogate, the required process involving the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and inclusion of an unaffiliated resident representative, such as the Ombudsman, was not followed. In several cases, consent forms were either incomplete, missing required signatures, or improperly filled out, with sections for the resident's legal representative left blank or simply marked as 'IDT' without a signature or date. Interviews with the Administrator and DON confirmed that the Ombudsman had not participated in the Bioethics Committee/IDT meetings for over a year, contrary to facility policy, and that the Administrator should have signed as the responsible party on behalf of the IDT. For residents who were unable to make medical decisions, such as those prescribed psychotropic and antidepressant medications, the documentation of informed consent was inconsistent and incomplete. Forms for these residents often lacked the name and signature of the person who obtained consent, the date, and the required witness information. In some cases, the forms indicated that consent was obtained from the resident, despite documentation showing the resident lacked decision-making capacity. Additionally, for one resident, the consent for advanced wound care services was obtained from the resident, even though the medical record indicated the resident was unable to provide consent. Other deficiencies included missing or incomplete information on consent forms for residents who could make their needs known but not medical decisions. For example, forms were missing the date and signature of the person who placed a consent call, the date and signature of the eligible provider or clinician, the date and name/signature of a witness, and the date and signature of the resident or their power of attorney. In some cases, instructions for distributing copies of the consent forms were not followed, and the required information was not completed. Interviews with nursing staff and the DON confirmed these findings and acknowledged that the informed consents should have been properly signed and dated according to policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙