Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0759
E

Medication Error Rate Exceeds 5% Due to Multiple Administration Failures

Sacramento, California Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, as evidenced by four errors out of 27 observed opportunities during medication administration for three residents. For one resident with schizophrenia, a licensed nurse did not administer the prescribed dose of haloperidol as ordered, due to a discrepancy between the physician's order and the available medication dose in the facility. The nurse withheld the medication pending clarification, and it was confirmed that the correct dose should have been available for administration according to the physician's order and facility policy. Another resident with epilepsy was administered divalproex sodium by a licensed nurse who failed to wear gloves, despite the medication label and physician order specifying glove use due to the hazardous nature of the drug. The nurse acknowledged the omission and the reason for the glove requirement. The facility's policy also required adherence to manufacturer specifications and physician orders during medication administration. A third resident, a transplant recipient, was administered mycophenolate without the nurse wearing gloves, contrary to both the medication label and physician order, which required glove use. Additionally, this resident did not receive the prescribed aspirin during the observed medication pass, and the nurse was unable to clarify the timing or reason for the missed dose. The DON confirmed that the expectation was for nurses to follow the e-MAR and physician orders, and that the aspirin should have been administered as ordered.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙