Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions for High-Risk Resident

Encinitas, California Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions as outlined in the care plan for a resident identified as high risk for falls. The resident, who had a history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis due to a previous stroke, severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for transfers, was care planned to have a fall mat placed beside the bed whenever in bed. Despite this, multiple observations over two days revealed that the fall mat was not present at the bedside while the resident was in bed. Interviews with staff, including LVNs and CNAs, confirmed that the expectation was for a fall mat to be in place for the resident, and that both nursing and CNA staff were responsible for ensuring interventions were implemented. However, there was confusion among staff regarding who was responsible for placing and documenting the presence of the fall mat. Some staff believed it was the nurses' responsibility, while others thought CNAs should handle it, and documentation practices did not consistently include the fall mat intervention. Further interviews with facility leadership, including the ADON, DON, and Administrator, confirmed that the fall mat should have remained in the resident's room and been in use whenever the resident was in bed. The absence of the fall mat was noted by staff, but no one could account for its removal or ensure its replacement, resulting in the resident being left without a key fall prevention intervention as required by the care plan and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙