Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan for Use of Low Air Loss Mattress

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was revised to specifically address the use of a low air loss (LAL) mattress, which is a specialized device used to prevent and treat pressure ulcers. The resident in question had significant medical conditions, including metabolic encephalopathy, hemiplegia, and cerebral infarction, and was assessed as being at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and lacked the capacity to make decisions. The care plan in place addressed the risk for skin breakdown and included general interventions such as assessing risk and using pressure-relieving devices as needed, but did not specify the type of device to be used. During a review of the care plan and interviews with facility staff, it was confirmed that the care plan had not been updated to reflect the use of the LAL mattress for this resident. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the care plan lacked specificity regarding the pressure-relieving device, which was necessary for consistent and individualized care. Facility policy required that care plans be revised as residents' conditions changed, but this was not done in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙