Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
D

Facility Assessment Lacks Required Involvement and Staffing Plans

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that its Facility Assessment was developed with the active involvement of required individuals, including direct care staff, direct care representatives, residents, residents' representatives, and family members. Review of the Facility Assessment did not show evidence of participation from these groups in the assessment process. Additionally, the assessment did not address the resources necessary to care for residents during weekends or include a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff. Furthermore, the Facility Assessment lacked a contingency plan for staffing needs, which is required to ensure adequate staffing during both routine operations and emergencies without activating the facility's emergency plan. During an interview and document review, the Administrator confirmed that the Facility Assessment was not updated to reflect the latest CMS guidance and acknowledged the absence of required involvement and planning elements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙