Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Timely Report Respiratory Illness Outbreak to Public Health Authorities

Chico, California Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comply with state and local public health authority requirements for timely reporting of a respiratory illness outbreak. Between 3/30/25 and 4/8/25, a total of 11 residents and 3 staff members exhibited symptoms such as cough, runny nose, sore throat, and shortness of breath, with some being diagnosed with pneumonia or bronchitis and others requiring hospital transfer. Despite the facility's policy requiring prompt communication and determination of reportable infections, the outbreak was not reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) until 4/8/25, exceeding the required 24-hour reporting timeframe outlined in state regulations. Record review and interviews confirmed that the Infection Preventionist (IP), who was new to the position, did not submit the outbreak report to CDPH until several days after the initial cases were identified. The facility's own infection control surveillance policy and the State Operations Manual both require immediate action and reporting when a communicable disease outbreak is suspected. The delay in reporting was acknowledged by the IP during the survey, and the facility's documentation showed a clear timeline of symptom onset and diagnoses among residents and staff prior to the eventual notification to public health authorities.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙