Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
E

Failure to Hold Medication per Physician-Ordered Blood Pressure Parameters

Santa Clara, California Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident received the medication Midodrine HCl outside of the physician-ordered parameters. The resident had an order for Midodrine HCl 5 mg by mouth three times daily for hypotension, with instructions to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was greater than 120 mmHg. Despite this, the medication administration record (MAR) showed that the resident received Midodrine on multiple occasions when the SBP exceeded 120 mmHg, specifically on five occasions in March and eight occasions in April, as well as once in May. During an interview and record review, an LVN confirmed that the medication should not have been administered when the SBP was above the ordered threshold, acknowledging that the medication was given inappropriately on 14 separate incidents. The facility's medication administration policy required staff to obtain and record vital signs and to hold medications when vital signs were outside the physician's prescribed parameters, which was not followed in these instances.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙