Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Prevention Interventions

Inglewood, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nursing staff failed to implement the care plan interventions for a resident who was admitted with intact skin and identified as being at moderate risk for pressure ulcer (PU) development. The resident's care plan included applying barrier cream and performing daily skin checks to prevent skin breakdown, but these interventions were not carried out. Documentation showed that the resident was bedfast, had limited mobility, and required total assistance with personal care, placing them at increased risk for PU. Despite these risk factors, there was no evidence that barrier cream was applied or that daily skin assessments were documented. As a result of these omissions, the resident developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the sacral area, which was identified when the resident was transferred to the hospital. Interviews with the treatment nurse and DON confirmed that the prescribed interventions were not followed, and the facility's policy required daily skin inspections and use of barrier products for residents at risk. The lack of adherence to the care plan and facility policy directly led to the development of the pressure ulcer.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙