Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
E

Failure to Ensure Call Lights and Pad Sensors Were Within Reach for High-Risk Residents

Covina, California Survey Completed on 04-19-2025

Penalty

Fine: $54,900
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that pad sensors and call lights were within reach for three residents who were assessed as high risk for falls and had significant cognitive and physical impairments. For one resident with dementia, osteoporosis, and a traumatic fracture, the care plan required the call light to be kept within easy reach and encouraged its use for assistance. However, during observation, the pad sensor was found hanging on the left siderail, out of reach, despite the resident being stronger on the right side. The assigned CNA confirmed the resident could not reach the pad sensor and acknowledged it should have been placed on the resident's strong side. Another resident with dementia, muscle weakness, and left-sided hemiparesis was also found with the call light on the floor on the left side of the bed, which was not accessible due to the resident's inability to use the left arm and hand. The LVN present confirmed the call light should have been placed on the resident's strong side for timely assistance. Both the Director of Nursing and the LVN stated that facility policy requires call lights to be within easy reach of residents, especially those at high risk for falls. A third resident with metabolic encephalopathy, Parkinson's disease, and muscle weakness was observed with the call light on the floor and not within reach. Staff interviews confirmed the call light should not be on the floor due to infection control and accessibility concerns. Facility policies reviewed indicated that residents must be provided with a means to call for assistance from their bed, and alternative communication methods should be documented in the care plan if needed. These observations and interviews demonstrated a failure to follow care plans and facility policies regarding resident safety and supervision.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙