Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Verify PEG Tube Placement Prior to Enteral Feeding

Sacramento, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a licensed nurse administered a bolus feeding to a resident with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube without first verifying the tube's placement, as required by physician orders and facility policy. The nurse checked for bowel sounds and residual amount but omitted the step of confirming PEG tube placement prior to starting the enteral feeding. During the feeding, the resident exhibited intermittent coughing. The nurse later acknowledged not checking the tube placement and recognized the importance of this step to ensure the tube was correctly positioned in the stomach before administering the feeding. The resident involved had a history of diabetes mellitus, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and required ongoing attention to a gastrostomy. The resident was cognitively moderately impaired and dependent on tube feeding and water flushes, as documented in the care plan. Facility policy and physician orders specifically required verification of tube placement before each feeding, but this protocol was not followed during the observed incident. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that checking tube placement is the expected standard of practice to prevent complications.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙