Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident Discharged to Hospital

Oceanside, California Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for a resident who was transferred to the hospital and subsequently died there. The resident, who had a medical history including multiple sclerosis, urinary tract infection, and sepsis, was admitted to the facility and later experienced respiratory distress, prompting a family-requested transfer to the hospital. Documentation showed the resident was transferred to the hospital and later died there. However, the MDS assessment was inaccurately coded as a death in the facility, rather than a discharge to the hospital followed by death at the hospital. Interviews with MDS staff revealed confusion and human error in the coding process. One MDS nurse initially began a discharge assessment, but another nurse changed it to a death assessment based on an incorrect assumption about the resident's place of death. Both MDS staff and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's discharge location and date of death, resulting in inaccurate data being submitted to CMS.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙