Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0848
D

Arbitration Agreement Lacks Required Information on Neutral Arbitrator and Venue

Temple City, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that its arbitration agreement, as signed by a resident, included information regarding the use of a neutral arbitrator and the selection of a venue convenient to both parties, as required by federal regulations and the facility's own policy. During review, it was found that the arbitration agreement signed by a resident did not contain these provisions. The Resident Ambassador, who explained the agreement to the resident, stated that she only read what was included in the document and did not provide information about a neutral arbitrator or convenient venue, as this information was not present in the form and she was unaware it was necessary. The Admissions Director confirmed that the facility had recently adopted a shortened version of the arbitration agreement and was not aware that it needed to include language about a neutral arbitrator and convenient venue. The facility's policy indicated that the arbitration agreement should comply with federal and state laws, and that the administrator or designee is responsible for ensuring the use of the latest compliant version. This omission resulted in an incomplete understanding of the arbitration agreement for the resident involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙