Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Proper Discharge Notice and Notification to Ombudsman

Lodi, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a 30-day advance written notice of discharge to a resident, as required by both federal and state regulations. The resident, who had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, influenza, and pneumonia, was verbally informed of the discharge on the same day the facility attempted to discharge him and received the discharge paperwork at that time. There was no evidence that the resident received any prior written notification about the impending discharge before that day, despite the facility's policy and regulatory requirements for advance notice. Additionally, the facility did not send a copy of the Notice of Transfer or Discharge to the Ombudsman's office on the same day the resident was served the notice. The resident contacted the Ombudsman independently and was informed that their office had not received the required notice from the facility. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the notice was not sent to the Ombudsman, and there was a misunderstanding among staff regarding the timing and necessity of this notification, particularly for residents with Medi-Cal coverage. Furthermore, there was a discrepancy between the discharge location listed on the resident's Notice of Transfer or Discharge and the location specified in the physician's discharge order. The notice indicated one homeless shelter, while the physician's order specified a different shelter. Facility staff, including the Social Services Director, Case Manager, and ADON, acknowledged that the discharge locations should have matched and confirmed the inconsistency. The facility's own policy requires that the specific discharge location be accurately documented and communicated.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙