Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Involve Resident in Discharge Planning

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its policy and procedures for discharge planning for one resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease, was assessed as having the capacity to understand and make decisions, with intact cognitive skills for daily decisions. The resident was independent in bed mobility and required varying levels of assistance with other activities of daily living. The care plan for discharge planning included interventions such as providing written and verbal instructions at the patient/family's level of understanding and reviewing and discussing the discharge plan with the resident and family as appropriate. Despite these requirements, a review of the case manager's progress notes revealed that only the resident's family member had been contacted regarding discharge planning, with no documentation indicating that the resident was informed or involved in the discharge plan over the previous three months. The case manager confirmed there was no evidence in the notes to show the resident's involvement. Facility policies reviewed stated that residents have the right to be informed of and participate in their care planning and treatment, and that post-discharge plans should be developed with the assistance of the resident and family. This lack of documentation and involvement constituted a failure to ensure the resident was properly informed and involved in their discharge plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙