Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inoperative Door Alarm

Prescott, Arizona Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of dementia, disorientation, and a recent fracture was admitted to the facility and assessed as a moderate elopement risk upon admission. The resident's cognitive status declined over time, as indicated by a drop in the BIMS score from 10 to 3, reflecting severe cognitive impairment. Physician orders were in place for a wanderguard device due to the risk of elopement, and staff were instructed to monitor the device's function. Despite these measures, the resident was last seen at the nurses station and was later found at a nearby emergency room, having left the facility without staff knowledge. Staff interviews confirmed that the wanderguard was in place at the time of the incident, but the front door alarm was not functioning, allowing the resident to exit undetected. Staff reported that residents at risk for elopement are typically monitored with wanderguards and that door alarms are expected to alert staff if such residents approach exits. However, on the day of the incident, the malfunctioning front door alarm failed to activate, and the resident was able to leave the premises. The deficiency was further evidenced by staff statements acknowledging the resident's increased elopement risk following improved mobility and the lack of immediate staff awareness of the resident's departure. Facility policy required reinforcement of procedures for residents at risk of elopement, but these procedures were not effectively implemented in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙