Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Reflect Resident Falls in MDS Assessments

Spring Branch, Texas Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the fall history of two residents. For one resident with a history of hemiplegia and a non-ruptured cerebral aneurysm, the Annual MDS assessment did not document a fall without injury that occurred earlier in the year, despite nursing progress notes and post-fall reviews clearly indicating the incident. The resident was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance with transfers, and the fall was unwitnessed but resulted in no injury. Another resident, diagnosed with multi-system degeneration of the autonomic nervous system and Parkinsonism, experienced two falls without injury and one fall with a minor injury within the look-back period for her Quarterly MDS assessment. These incidents were documented in nursing progress notes, neuro checks, and post-fall reviews, including details of abrasions and pain complaints. However, the MDS assessment for this resident did not reflect any of these falls, despite the availability of supporting documentation in the medical record. Interviews with the Nurse Assessment Coordinator and the Director of Nursing revealed that the process for completing MDS assessments involved reviewing fall-related documentation, such as UDAs and neuro checks. The Nurse Assessment Coordinator acknowledged missing the falls in the MDS due to oversight and timing issues. The facility's policy required accurate and certified assessments by qualified professionals, with the MDS serving as the clinical basis for care planning and delivery. Despite the care plans being updated, the MDS assessments did not accurately capture the residents' fall histories as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙