Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Include DNR Status in Resident Care Plan

Schertz, Texas Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including cancer, shortness of breath, and pain, who was also receiving hospice services. Despite the resident having a documented out-of-hospital do not resuscitate (DNR) order and a physician's order for DNR, the care plan did not reflect the resident's code status. The care plan review did not include this critical information, and there was no evidence that the interdisciplinary team had reviewed or updated the care plan to include the DNR status. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibility for updating the care plan with code status changes. The social worker stated she would update the care plan when code status changed, but had not signed off on the relevant section. The MDS coordinator acknowledged the absence of a code status care plan and indicated that it should have been included, noting that care plans are interdisciplinary documents. The administrator confirmed that the care plan should be person-centered and complete to ensure staff have the necessary information to provide proper care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙