Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Secure Indwelling Catheter as Ordered

Daingerfield, Texas Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with an indwelling foley catheter was observed to have the catheter unsecured to her leg, contrary to physician orders and the facility's care plan. The resident, an elderly female with diagnoses including diabetes, dementia, protein calorie malnutrition, and urine retention, had a care plan and physician order requiring the catheter to be secured with a stabilizer and checked every shift. Despite documentation indicating compliance, direct observation revealed the catheter was not secured, and both a CNA and an LVN confirmed the absence of a securement device during their checks. The LVN noted that the resident often removed the adhesive part of the securement device, but acknowledged the catheter should be properly secured to prevent trauma or bleeding. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and Administrator, confirmed the expectation that catheters be properly secured and that it was the responsibility of the nursing team to ensure this. The facility's policy on urinary catheter care also required the use of a securement device to prevent complications. The failure to secure the catheter as required was directly observed and acknowledged by staff, representing a lapse in following established care protocols for catheter management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙