Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Develop and Update Comprehensive, Individualized Care Plans

Lubbock, Texas Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized care plans for two residents, specifically neglecting to address their vision, activities, and pressure ulcer risks. For one resident, the care plan was not revised or updated to include interventions and goals related to vision, despite documentation indicating vision impairment and risk for pressure ulcers. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Area Assessment (CAA) summaries identified these issues, but the care plan did not reflect them. For the second resident, the care plan lacked documentation and interventions for visual function, activities, and pressure ulcers, even though the resident's assessments indicated impaired vision, use of corrective lenses, and risk for pressure ulcers. The relevant sections of the MDS were either incomplete or not addressed in the care plan, and the CAA summaries triggered concerns that were not care planned. Interviews with facility staff, including the Administrator, DON, and MDS Coordinator, confirmed that care plans are intended to be individualized and updated based on assessments and resident needs. However, the care plans for these residents were not updated or individualized as required, and the facility's policy mandates that care plans include measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions for all identified needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙