Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Ensure Understanding of Binding Arbitration Agreements

Bakersfield, California Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its own policies and procedures regarding the explanation and execution of Binding Arbitration Agreements (BAA) for two residents. In the first instance, the Admission Coordinator (AC) had a resident with a diagnosis of dementia and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating moderate cognitive impairment sign a BAA. The AC relied on basic questions and a review of nursing notes and diagnoses to determine the resident's understanding but did not identify documented episodes of confusion or the dementia diagnosis. The resident was considered their own responsible party, but the documentation showed cognitive impairment and confusion, raising concerns about the resident's ability to fully comprehend the legal implications of the BAA they signed. In the second instance, the AC had another resident sign a BAA even though the resident's admission record indicated that their son was the responsible party and that the resident's spoken language was not English. The AC did not document the use of a translator, and the responsible party did not sign the BAA. The facility's policies require that residents or their representatives be informed of the nature and implications of binding arbitration agreements in a manner they can understand, and that language access services be provided for individuals with limited English proficiency. These requirements were not met in either case, resulting in the residents not fully understanding the legal documents they signed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙