Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Deficient Suprapubic Catheter Care and Documentation

Bakersfield, California Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Licensed nurses at the facility failed to demonstrate competency in assessing and changing a suprapubic catheter for a resident with a neuromuscular bladder dysfunction. The resident was admitted with a suprapubic catheter, and physician orders specified that the catheter should be changed as needed for dislodgement, malfunction, or leakage. However, there was no written documentation of any catheter changes over a four-month period, despite a nurse recalling a change due to leakage two months prior. The Director of Nursing was unable to provide evidence of the procedure or documentation, and the Director of Staff Development could not produce records of nurse competencies related to suprapubic catheter care and changes. Additionally, the facility's policy and procedure for suprapubic catheter care did not specify which clinical personnel were qualified to change the catheter, nor did it outline the required qualifications or competencies for performing this task. The policy also failed to align with current standards set by the Society of Urologic Nurses and Associates, which require clear protocols regarding personnel qualifications and training for suprapubic catheter changes. These deficiencies were identified through interviews, record reviews, and policy examination.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙