Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Communicate Elopement Risk and Ensure Resident Identification

Santa Monica, California Survey Completed on 04-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure proper communication and implementation of safety measures for a resident identified as high risk for elopement. The resident, who had diagnoses including parkinsonism, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, was assessed as lacking the mental capacity to make medical decisions and was severely cognitively impaired. Documentation indicated the resident had a history of leaving the facility and was at risk for elopement, with orders in place for frequent monitoring and the use of a Wanderguard device. However, staff assigned to the resident were not formally notified of the resident's elopement risk, and the resident was not included on the CNA assignment sheet. The CNA caring for the resident was unaware of the purpose of the Wanderguard or the resident's risk status due to lack of communication during shift handoff and morning huddles. Additionally, the resident was observed without an identification wristband on multiple occasions, contrary to facility policy requiring such identification for resident safety. Staff interviews confirmed that the absence of the ID wristband could hinder proper identification and safe care delivery. The facility's policies on Wanderguard use and resident identification were not followed, as evidenced by the lack of communication regarding the resident's risk status and the missing ID wristband, placing the resident at increased risk for elopement and other safety incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙