Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Follow Professional Standards for Insulin Administration

Petaluma, California Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed for a resident with diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, and dysphagia. The resident was admitted with orders for both long-acting and short-acting insulin, but there was no documented order for a sliding scale or blood sugar parameters for insulin administration. Additionally, there was no evidence that blood sugar levels were checked prior to administering insulin lispro in the afternoon, as required by standard practice and facility policy. On one occasion, the resident experienced an episode of distress, with vital signs indicating low blood pressure and heart rate, and an oxygen saturation below normal. Paramedics found the resident's blood sugar to be 69 mg/dl, and the resident was subsequently sent to the hospital. The emergency department determined that the resident had experienced a hypoglycemic and mildly hypotensive episode, and recommended reducing insulin doses. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that blood sugar checks were not performed prior to insulin administration, and that sliding scale and parameter orders were not in place as expected. Further review of facility policies indicated that nurses were required to check blood glucose per physician order or facility protocol and to notify providers of any discrepancies prior to administering insulin. The lack of sliding scale orders, blood sugar parameters, and failure to check blood sugar prior to insulin administration were confirmed by staff and the Director of Nursing. These omissions were not addressed until after the resident's hospitalization.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙