Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Routine Diabetic Foot Checks

Muscoda, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide routine diabetic foot checks as required by physician orders and facility policy for two residents with diabetes. For one resident with type 2 diabetes, diabetic polyneuropathy, and a history of pressure ulcers, the care plan and physician orders specified daily foot checks at bedtime. However, documentation showed that foot checks were not completed or signed off on several dates, and there was no documentation of foot checks prior to the initiation of the order. Interviews with nursing staff and the interim director of nursing confirmed that if the checks were not documented, they were not done, and that nightly foot checks were expected. For another resident with diabetes and a recent ankle fracture, physician orders and the treatment administration record also required nightly diabetic foot checks. Review of the records revealed multiple dates across several months where foot checks were not completed. An LPN interviewed could not recall specific details about the resident's foot checks and admitted that checks were sometimes rushed due to the resident's agitation. Additionally, a dressing placed by podiatry remained unchanged for several days, despite documentation indicating that foot checks had been completed. The interim director of nursing confirmed that foot checks should be completed and documented as ordered, and that any abnormalities should be recorded in a progress note.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙