Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Monitor and Document Indwelling Catheter Care

Clarkston, Washington Survey Completed on 04-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to properly monitor and document the use and function of indwelling urinary catheters for two residents with complex urinary needs. Both residents had physician orders and care plans requiring staff to measure and record urinary output every shift, as well as to monitor for signs and symptoms of catheter-associated complications. However, review of treatment administration records (TARs) revealed numerous missed opportunities for documentation of urinary output, with 21 out of 62 entries missing for both residents in March, and additional missed entries in April. There were also multiple instances where urinary output was recorded as less than 30ml per hour, but no corresponding nursing assessments or notifications to medical providers were documented in the progress notes. For one resident with a neurogenic bladder and a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs), the lack of monitoring and response to low urinary output led to a situation where the resident experienced a distended abdomen, pressure, and leaking catheter, which was only addressed after a significant delay. The catheter was eventually replaced, resulting in immediate relief and drainage of a large volume of urine. The resident later reported that staff did not respond promptly to their concerns and that they were diagnosed with a UTI upon hospital admission. Interviews with staff confirmed that documentation was inconsistent, particularly among agency staff, and that there was confusion regarding which residents required output monitoring. The second resident, admitted with obstructive uropathy and also requiring an indwelling catheter, experienced similar lapses in care. Documentation of urinary output was frequently missing, and low output readings were not followed up with assessments or provider notifications. Progress notes failed to address these changes in condition, and staff interviews confirmed awareness of ongoing issues with monitoring and recording urinary outputs for residents with specific orders. The facility's policy required appropriate catheter care and monitoring, but these standards were not consistently met for the residents reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙