Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
E

Incomplete Facility-Wide Assessment Documentation

Mount Vernon, Washington Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine the necessary resources for competent resident care during both routine operations and emergencies. The assessment provided by the facility was dated 07/30/2024 and included outdated information, such as the names of the prior Administrator and Director of Nursing Services. The documentation only included a Part I template and omitted several required elements. Specifically, the assessment did not address the care needs of the resident population, including types of diseases, conditions, disabilities, and acuity levels. It also lacked information on required staff competencies, physical environment and equipment needs, available services, personnel details, contracts with third parties, and health information technology resources. During an interview, the current Administrator confirmed that the provided assessment was the most current version and that no additional information was available.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙