Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Dietary Preferences

Mc Kenzie, Tennessee Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accommodate dietary preferences for two residents as required by its own policy and regulatory standards. The policy states that food preferences should be honored unless contraindicated, and that the Food Service Manager or designee is responsible for interviewing residents to obtain and update their food preferences, which should be reflected on the resident's tray card. However, for both residents reviewed, there was no evidence that their food preferences were properly documented or communicated to dietary staff. One resident, with a history of muscle wasting, chronic pain, and past trauma related to food deprivation, expressed a preference for pancakes and French toast, but these preferences were not discussed in quarterly nutritional reviews or reflected on the tray card. The resident reported not receiving preferred breakfast items and instead received oatmeal, which was not among his stated preferences. Observations confirmed that while pancakes were served to others, the resident did not consistently receive his preferred foods, and his tray card lacked any indication of likes or dislikes. Another resident, with diagnoses including dementia and a history of dehydration, was documented as disliking tea and being at risk for poor oral intake. Despite this, the resident's nutritional assessment was incomplete, and the tray card did not indicate beverage dislikes. The resident was observed to have tea on his tray, which he did not drink. Interviews with the Dietary Manager revealed that food preferences were not consistently documented or accessible to staff preparing trays, and the process for updating and communicating preferences was not followed as outlined in facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙