Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Update Care Plans for Resident Needs and Interventions

Mitchell, South Dakota Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $70,980
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were updated to reflect the current needs and preferences of three residents. For one resident with major depressive disorder and PTSD, the care plan did not include her PTSD diagnosis or interventions to prevent re-traumatization, nor did it mention the use of a foot cradle that had been implemented months prior. Staff members, including CNAs and the MDS coordinator, were unaware of the resident's trauma history, triggers, or the specialized equipment in use, indicating a lack of communication and documentation regarding her psychosocial and physical care needs. Another resident's care plan did not reflect her preference to skip breakfast or her use of a hiking water bladder for fluid intake while in bed, despite staff being aware of these preferences and accommodations. The omission of these details from the care plan meant that her individualized dietary and hydration needs were not formally documented for all staff to follow. The intake team and MDS coordinator typically managed care plan updates, but these specific preferences and equipment were not included. A third resident's care plan listed a resolved surgical wound on the neck but failed to document current venous stasis wounds on both lower legs and the use of Unna boots for treatment. Nursing staff confirmed the presence of these wounds and the ongoing treatment, but the care plan was not updated to reflect the current skin integrity issues or interventions. The facility did not provide a care plan policy during the survey, and staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices regarding the inclusion of wound treatments and specialized equipment in care plans.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙