Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
G

Resident Sustains Burns Due to Improper Heat Pack Application

Salem, Oregon Survey Completed on 04-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with kidney disease, who was cognitively intact and required partial assistance with upper body dressing, was admitted without any skin impairment. The resident had standing orders for a heat pack, but these orders were not transcribed onto the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). On one occasion, a CNA provided the resident with an insta-hot heat pack without first communicating with a nurse or ensuring a barrier was placed between the heat pack and the resident's skin. The CNA handed the heat pack directly to the resident, who then applied it herself/himself. Staff did not monitor or ensure the timely removal of the heat pack. As a result, the resident kept the heat pack on for an unknown period, leading to the development of superficial blisters and redness on the shoulder and underarm. The next morning, the resident reported itching, and upon assessment, clear and uncapped blisters were observed, with some skin sloughing noted. The incident occurred due to a lack of staff supervision, failure to follow proper procedures for heat pack application, and absence of documentation and communication regarding the intervention.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙