Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0694
E

Failure to Follow Physician Orders for IV Therapy and PICC Line Care

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

Fine: $12,7353 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for two residents requiring intravenous (IV) therapy. For one resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line, the dressing was observed to be dated nearly two weeks prior, despite a physician's order to change the dressing weekly and as needed. Staff interviews confirmed that the dressing should have been changed according to the order, but it was not, and the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that nurses are expected to follow physician orders for dressing changes. In a separate incident, another resident receiving IV fluids was observed to have their infusion running at a rate higher than the physician-ordered 75 ml/hr, with the dial set between 80 and 100 ml/hr and the actual rate at approximately 90 ml/hr. The resident was unaware of the infusion rate, and an LPN later adjusted the rate to match the physician's order after being informed. Both incidents demonstrate a failure to administer IV therapy as ordered and in accordance with professional standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙