Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Provide Cholecystostomy Dressing Changes as Ordered

Durham, North Carolina Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide cholecystostomy dressing changes as ordered by the physician for a resident with a biliary drain. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of chronic cholecystitis managed with a percutaneous cholecystostomy tube, had physician orders for dressing changes every twelve hours. Documentation on the Medication Administration Record indicated that the dressing was changed on a specific date by two nurses, but both nurses later stated in interviews that they did not perform the dressing change as ordered. One nurse documented the dressing change based on the assumption that a wound nurse had completed the task, but the wound nurse was not present in the facility that day and could not identify who was responsible for wound care on that date. The Director of Nursing was also unable to identify the nurse assigned to wound care on the relevant date. Further review of the Treatment Administration Record and direct observation revealed additional inconsistencies. The wound nurse documented dressing changes on subsequent days, but during an observation, the dressing was found to be dated two days prior, indicating it had not been changed as recorded. The wound nurse explained that she relied on information from a nurse aide, who had assumed another nurse had changed the dressing after hearing a comment about the sutures. However, the nurse in question confirmed she only inspected the site and did not change the dressing. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the dressing should have been changed daily per physician orders by either the wound nurse or the assigned nurse.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙