Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Contact Precautions for Resident on Transmission-Based Precautions

Charlotte, North Carolina Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Two nurse aides failed to implement required Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) while providing incontinence care to a resident with a physician order for contact precautions due to Enterobacter cloacae complex in her urine. During the observed care, both aides wore only gloves and did not use gowns, despite the facility's policy requiring both gloves and gowns for interactions involving contact with the resident or their environment under contact precautions. The signage on the resident's door indicated Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) rather than the specific contact precautions required by the physician order. Interviews with the nurse aides revealed they were unaware the resident was on TBP, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that appropriate signage indicating the need for gown and gloves was not posted. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that he did not add a contact precaution sign because an EBP sign was already present for the roommate, not realizing this would not communicate the specific requirements for the resident in question. The administrator also confirmed that a contact precaution sign should have been posted per the physician order.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙