Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Maintain Consistent Advance Directive Documentation

Charlotte, North Carolina Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accuracy and consistency of a resident's advance directive throughout the medical record. One resident was admitted with an advance directive indicating full code status in the care plan, with interventions including the administration of CPR. However, a physician's order and the advance directive binder at the nurses' station both indicated the resident was designated as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). This inconsistency was present across different documentation sources within the facility. During interviews, nursing staff and the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the discrepancy, noting that the care plan had not been updated to reflect the current DNR status. The MDS Coordinator, responsible for updating the care plan, stated that routine audits are conducted but was unable to explain why this resident's care plan was missed, attributing it to an oversight. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both confirmed their expectation that the care plan should be updated in a timely manner to match any changes in code status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙