Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments Due to Documentation Discrepancies

Port Chester, New York Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected a resident's status, resulting in discrepancies across multiple assessment dates. Specifically, the MDS assessments for one resident showed inconsistent documentation regarding extremity impairments, use of assistive devices, and functional abilities. For example, some assessments indicated impairment in upper and/or lower extremities and the use of a wheelchair or walker, while others documented no impairments and no assistive device use, despite the resident consistently using a wheelchair. The resident involved had diagnoses including vascular dementia, cardiomyopathy, and a mood disorder, and was noted to have varying levels of cognitive impairment and functional dependency in the MDS records. The inconsistencies were found in assessments completed by different staff members, including the Regional Director and the Director of Rehabilitation, who admitted to errors in coding the resident's use of assistive devices and functional status. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the information in several assessments was incorrect and that the resident's use of a wheelchair had not changed. Interviews revealed that the MDS Coordinator oversees the completion of the MDS but relies on each department to complete and sign off on their respective sections. The Coordinator stated that it was unrealistic to review all areas of the assessment and that the discrepancies should have been identified, especially when the same person completed multiple sections. The Director of Rehabilitation also confirmed an error in coding the resident's device use, further contributing to the inaccurate assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙