Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Inform Residents of Grievance Process and Document Resolutions

Port Chester, New York Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors found that the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives were properly informed about the grievance process, including how to file grievances, who the grievance official was, and the contact information for independent entities such as the State agency and Ombudsman. There were no postings in prominent locations throughout the facility to notify residents of their rights to file grievances orally or in writing, nor was there information about the expected time frame for grievance review or the right to receive a written decision. The facility's policy required such notifications and prompt investigations, but these were not observed in practice. A review of grievance reports revealed that a resident's representative filed daily grievances over several months, covering issues such as care, safety, hygiene, financial matters, and rights violations. The documentation of these grievances consistently lacked specific resolutions, with reports often stating that issues remained ongoing and that the representative's expectations were considered unrealistic. The facility's records did not include written decisions confirming or denying the grievances, details of corrective actions taken, or the dates decisions were issued, as required by regulation. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Social Services and the Assistant Administrator, confirmed that the grievance process was not consistently followed. The Director of Social Services, who served as the grievance officer, did not keep track of grievances or their resolutions and was unsure if the grievance process was posted in the facility. The Assistant Administrator acknowledged ongoing difficulties with the resident's representative and confirmed that no satisfactory resolutions had been documented for the grievances. The lack of proper documentation and notification contributed directly to the deficiency cited.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙