Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
F

Failure to Adhere to Infection Control Protocols and Contact Precautions

Las Vegas, Nevada Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

Fine: $8,278
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices in several instances involving the use of shared medical equipment, adherence to contact isolation protocols, and education of staff and visitors regarding transmission-based precautions. In one case, a registered nurse disinfected a shared glucometer with an alcohol pad after use on a resident with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, despite the availability of EPA-approved disinfectant wipes and facility protocols requiring their use. The nurse believed alcohol pads were acceptable based on previous pharmacy guidance, but both the Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist later confirmed that only EPA-approved wipes with a specified contact time were appropriate for disinfecting shared glucometers to prevent cross-contamination. In another instance, staff failed to follow contact isolation procedures for a resident on precautions for possible Clostridium difficile infection. Despite clear signage and the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) at the room entrance, multiple staff members entered and exited the resident's room without donning the required PPE or performing hand hygiene with soap and water, as mandated for C. difficile precautions. Staff later acknowledged that they had not paid attention to the isolation signage and were aware that proper handwashing and PPE use were required but had not been performed. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that visitors and staff consistently adhered to contact precautions for a resident with a wound infection. A visitor entered and remained in the resident's room without wearing the required gown and gloves, stating they were unaware of the need for PPE. The facility's care plan and policies required education for visitors and documentation of such education, but there was no evidence in the medical record that the visitor had been informed about the precautions. Furthermore, a licensed practical nurse was observed entering the same resident's room without donning PPE, despite acknowledging the necessity of these measures to prevent infection spread.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙