Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
D

Failure to Implement PASARR Screening and Referral Process

Gardnerville, Nevada Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that there was a process in place to identify and refer residents for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II, and did not initiate a PASARR Level I submission for one of thirteen sampled residents. Specifically, a resident was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified psychosis and depression, but the PASARR Level I on file was completed years prior and did not reflect the current mental health diagnoses. The resident's active diagnoses, including psychosis and cognitive symptoms, were documented after admission, but there was no evidence that a new or updated PASARR Level I or a referral for Level II evaluation was initiated. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of understanding and training regarding PASARR processes. The Licensed Social Worker stated they had no responsibilities related to PASARR, and the Admissions Director admitted to not knowing what PASARR was or the required timeframes for completion. The Administrator confirmed that no staff member was overseeing PASARR procedures and acknowledged that the process was not being followed. The facility's policy required validation and tracking of PASARR Level I and referral for Level II when indicated, but this was not implemented for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙