Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0812
E

Failure to Reheat Food to Safe Temperature Prior to Service

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that food was reheated to the appropriate temperature as required by both manufacturer instructions and professional standards. During meal preparation, a cook removed multiple bags of chicken pot pie filling from a steam cooker, mixed them, and did not take the temperature at that time. Later, the cook was observed taking the temperature of the chicken and dumplings at the steam table, which measured 90°F, significantly below the required 165°F. The director of nutritional services (DNS) then reheated the food in the oven, but it only reached 145.3°F before being served to residents. The temperature log indicated a reading of 170°F, but both the cook and DNS could not confirm when or how this measurement was taken, and the DNS suspected the log entry was inaccurate. Further review revealed that the DNS was unaware of the manufacturer's instructions requiring the food to be reheated to 165°F and acknowledged uncertainty about whether this protocol was being followed. The cook admitted she was never sure the food had reached the required temperature and had only assumed it was 170°F. Additionally, when asked, the facility was unable to provide a policy regarding reheating food. As a result, 12 residents consumed food that may not have been reheated to a safe temperature, contrary to established standards and protocols.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙