Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Assess and Address Resident's Hearing Concerns

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to act upon and assess a resident's voiced complaints and observed difficulties with hearing. The resident, who had impaired memory and was identified as hard of hearing, was observed struggling to hear during interactions and did not use hearing aids. The care plan acknowledged the resident's hearing issues and included interventions such as minimizing background noise and offering an audiology appointment. Despite these interventions, there was no evidence in the medical record that a comprehensive hearing assessment was completed or that the resident was evaluated for potential reversible causes of hearing loss, such as earwax buildup. Staff interviews revealed that hearing assessments were only performed if a complaint was made and not on a routine basis, and there was uncertainty about the availability of necessary equipment for ear examinations. Additionally, although a family member requested an audiology appointment and documentation indicated that one was scheduled, there was no evidence that the appointment was completed, refused, or rescheduled. The facility's documentation lacked follow-up regarding the outcome of the scheduled audiology appointment, and no policy on hearing evaluations was provided when requested. These inactions resulted in the resident's hearing concerns not being adequately addressed, despite both family and staff noting ongoing hearing difficulties.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙