Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0676
D

Failure to Assess and Develop Interventions for Resident Refusing Personal Hygiene Care

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop individualized interventions to promote acceptance of bathing and personal hygiene care for a resident with impaired memory and cognitive function. The resident was observed to be disheveled, with greasy hair, soiled and long fingernails, and a visible brown substance on his hands. Documentation showed a pattern of the resident refusing showers and personal hygiene care, with staff offering alternative methods such as basin and wipes, which were also refused. Despite these repeated refusals, there was no evidence in the medical record that the facility had assessed or evaluated alternative approaches to facilitate the resident’s acceptance of care. Interviews with staff revealed that some nursing assistants had more success with the resident by using specific approaches, such as offering care when the resident returned from smoking or having the shower water running and hot. However, these successful strategies were not documented in the care plan, and other staff did not consistently re-approach the resident to provide care. Staff also noted that nail care was not consistently offered or documented, and there was uncertainty about whether it was being performed or recorded appropriately. The resident’s care plan identified a need for assistance with personal hygiene and bathing due to mental illness and impaired cognition, and set a goal for the resident to be clean and well-groomed. However, the care plan lacked specific interventions or strategies to address the resident’s repeated refusals or to promote acceptance of care. The facility’s personal hygiene policy required assistance based on individual needs and preferences but did not address how to manage or evaluate repeated refusals of care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙