Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Address and Care Plan Resident's Repeated Oxygen Therapy Refusals

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to analyze and care plan a resident's repeated declinations to wear supplemental oxygen as ordered. The resident, who had diagnoses including COPD, respiratory failure, heart failure, and other chronic conditions, was ordered to receive continuous supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation at or above 90%. Despite this, documentation and observations revealed that the resident frequently did not wear the prescribed oxygen, with multiple instances of refusal or removal of the nasal cannula noted in progress notes and during direct observation. The care plan for the resident included interventions such as assisting with oxygen tank changes, setting the oxygen flow rate, and monitoring oxygen saturation, but it did not address the resident's refusals or any alternative strategies for non-compliance. Staff documented several occasions where the resident either refused or removed the oxygen, sometimes after education on risks and benefits, but there was no evidence that these refusals were analyzed or incorporated into the care plan. Provider notes also lacked documentation of these refusals, and there was no indication that the care plan was updated to reflect the ongoing issue. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident often removed the nasal cannula, sometimes unintentionally, and that staff would encourage use and notify the provider. However, there was inconsistency in staff awareness and documentation of the refusals, and the assistant director of nursing stated that ongoing issues should be care planned. The facility's policy required explanations for medications or treatments not administered, but this was not consistently followed for the resident's oxygen therapy refusals.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙