Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Follow Up on Resident's Request for Hearing Aids

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to follow up and implement treatment for a resident who reported hearing loss and expressed interest in obtaining hearing aids. The resident, who had intact cognition and was noted to have adequate hearing on the quarterly MDS, reported to the provider during admission that he had an audiogram indicating some hearing loss, particularly in crowded environments, and was interested in further evaluation for hearing aids. The medical record showed that the resident declined in-house audiology services but wanted an audiology evaluation to pursue hearing aids. However, there was no documentation of any follow-up or action taken to address the resident's request for hearing aids. During interviews, the resident confirmed that he had discussed his need for hearing aids with a doctor but had not received any updates or the devices themselves. The nurse manager was unaware of the resident's request and, after reviewing the medical record and consulting with staff, found no evidence that the request had been addressed. The facility's policy identified audiology as a service that could be provided and charged to residents' personal funds but did not specify the process for assisting residents in obtaining such services.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙