Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Provide Comprehensive Pressure Ulcer Care and Monitoring

Worthington, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to monitor and complete comprehensive skin assessments, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and provide physician-ordered treatments as prescribed for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers with a history of such ulcers. The resident, who was obese, dependent on staff for lower body care, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and was always incontinent of bowels, was identified as having a healed stage III pressure ulcer and a moderate risk for pressure ulcers according to the Braden scale. The care plan included interventions for behavior management and pressure ulcer prevention, but the resident frequently refused care and preferred to sleep in a recliner rather than a bed. Between early March and early April, the treatment administration record indicated that a prescribed mixture of calmoseptime ointment and collagen fibers was applied to the resident's buttocks twice daily. However, there was no corresponding documentation of skin assessments or monitoring of the treated area during this period. During an observed care episode, staff did not follow the physician's order to mix the cream with collagen, nor did they measure or assess the affected areas. The nurse present was not comfortable with wound staging and deferred to the DON for assessment, and staff reported that the resident's behaviors often led to rushed care and missed steps. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent wound care practices, lack of proper documentation, and uncertainty regarding wound assessment and treatment. The infection preventionist and DON confirmed that the current wound treatment was not appropriate and that staff were expected to document wound conditions daily and seek guidance if unsure. Facility protocols required verification of physician orders and documentation of wound care and assessments, but these were not consistently followed, resulting in a failure to prevent new ulcers and properly manage existing skin breakdown.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙